Google has clearly been paying phone producers not to install third-party application stores

Google's Android working framework is viewed as being more "open" contrasted with Apple's iOS stage. Clients can introduce applications from outside the Play Store, and assuming they needed, they could even download and install third-party application stores like those from Amazon or Samsung, just to give some examples.

Strangely, in spite of this transparency, most phones just accompany the Play Store introduced, however why would that be? As per the antitrust grumbling that Epic has documented against Google, it has been uncovered that Google has really been paying phone makers not to incorporate outsider application stores in their phones.

This is essential for what Google is calling its "Head Device" program, where beginning from 2019, Google gave phone creators a bigger piece of its hunt income, more than they would get. In return, these phone producers would consent to deliver their gadgets without outsider application stores preinstalled on them.

This expansion in income knock it up from 8% to 12%, and for organizations like LG and Motorola, Google improved upon the arrangement by offering them anyplace between 3-6% of what clients would spend in the Play Store. Keeping that in mind, organizations like LG and Motorola assigned 95% and 98% of their gadgets as "Chief", while others like those made by organizations under BBK's umbrella (Oppo, Vivo, and OnePlus) had planned about 70% of their gadgets as "Head".

Epic has since contended that Google's practices viably shifted the scales against other third-party.